<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ask Enquiro &#187; b2b marketing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ask.enquiro.com/index.php/tag/b2b-marketing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ask.enquiro.com</link>
	<description>B2B Marketing Blog Focusing on the Online Space</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 15:41:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Moving from Desire to Inquire: The Second Stepping Stone</title>
		<link>http://ask.enquiro.com/2011/the-second-stepping-stone-inquire/</link>
		<comments>http://ask.enquiro.com/2011/the-second-stepping-stone-inquire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karl Hourigan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[B2B Buyer Behaviour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[b2b marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BuyerSphere]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ask.enquiro.com/?p=1930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every purchase starts with a desire, but the path from Desire to BUY will depend on how complex the purchase is. A complex sale might be described as one where there is a need for a lot of information. For example, imagine you manage a company that manufactures vinyl windows, and the company is in the happy position that business is booming and they need to expand their manufacturing capacity. Let’s say that expanding production at the current location is not feasible, so you need to find a bigger location to move into, or build a new factory. The new [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_1932" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 270px"><a href="http://ask.enquiro.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Second-Stone.jpg"><img src="http://ask.enquiro.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Second-Stone-260x300.jpg" alt="from Desire to Inquire" title="Second-Stone" width="260" height="300" class="size-medium wp-image-1932" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Buyers step from Desire to Inquire in a complex sale</p></div>
<p>Every purchase starts with a desire, but the path from Desire to BUY will depend on how complex the purchase is. A complex sale might be described as one where there is a need for a lot of information.  </p>
<p>For example, imagine you manage a company that manufactures vinyl windows, and the company is in the happy position that business is booming and they need to expand their manufacturing capacity. Let’s say that expanding production at the current location is not feasible, so you need to find a bigger location to move into, or build a new factory. </p>
<p>The new location will have to meet all kinds of criteria: it has to be in a convenient location for shipping and receiving, it has to be accessible for the workforce, it has to be large enough, it might have to include room for future expansion, it has to be affordable, and so on. Clearly, this is not a one-phone-call-does-it-all kind of purchase. You will have to consider leasing an existing building or buying a lot and building something new, plus issues like timing and transitioning from the old facility without disrupting business. It quickly gets complex.</p>
<p>To get a new factory up and running, you will start to do some research. Let’s call this the second stepping stone on your path to a purchase, “Inquire”. You might start out talking to colleagues, contacting associations you belong to, talking to friends and family, reading books and industry publications, and searching online for information on anything from negotiating land purchases to moving manufacturing equipment from one location to another. </p>
<p>If you’ve done this kind of thing before, then you might call on people you know who have helped you successfully navigate all the ins and outs of a major manufacturing facility move. In this example, there’s probably no single top-of-mind vendor that can fulfill your desire to increase manufacturing capacity. </p>
<p>As a customer steps from Desire to Inquire, we know from <a href="http://results.mediative.ca/buyersphere-download.html">many studies</a> that the initial inquiries will include an online search component. The search terms at this early stage will mostly be general in nature. This is the point where a customer, to use the vinyl window factory example, might be searching for general information on the pros and cons of leasing versus buying property or equipment. Later on in the process, they might start looking at lots of details, like lighting fixtures, but in the early Inquire stage, they’re at the wide end of the information funnel.</p>
<p><strong>The many faces of your customer</strong><br />
The path to the same end purchase can be different for different people in an organization. Let’s take a look at three personas: the “doer”, the “buyer”, and the “boss”. </p>
<p>A doer refers to the person who is going to be directly affected by the challenge/opportunity and interacting with the purchased solution; in a B2B purchase, the initial impetus for a purchase may start here, when a need is first realized and a desire for a solution is expressed. It could be the doer in an organization who first recognizes that their own efficiency and productivity could be increased with, say, a particular kind of software solution. In some purchase scenarios, a doer may touch all 7 stepping stones, or they may have dropped out much earlier on the path. They may also move back and forth as the sales process proceeds (or recedes, as the case may be). </p>
<div id="attachment_1931" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 276px"><a href="http://ask.enquiro.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/All-Stones.jpg"><img src="http://ask.enquiro.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/All-Stones-266x300.jpg" alt="All Seven Stepping Stones" title="All-Stones" width="266" height="300" class="size-medium wp-image-1931" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Seven Stepping Stones on the Path to Purchase</p></div>
<p>The doer who initiated the sales process (i.e. recognized the desire) may drop out after the Shortlist step. Notice, too, that a sales person from a vendor may not have even touched the process at all until they suddenly find themselves at the Negotiate step; it may have been all Marketing up to this point. There are also a couple of different stones where the vendor’s process may move from Marketing to Sales, so it’s vital to get the process right for handing it from one team to the other. </p>
<p>The “buyer”, on the other hand, may not even enter the path until the Negotiate step. The buyer will be judging a purchase decision by very different criteria than the people who may be more directly involved in implementing the purchased solution (the doers). </p>
<p>Depending on a company’s purchasing process, a buyer may be able to assume that other managers have vetted the purchase up to that point to make sure it’s a viable solution to a recognized challenge or opportunity, and their job now is financing the purchase, getting the best deal and terms, and checking the vendor’s reputation to ensure long term support for the purchase.</p>
<p><strong>Job #1 – Be There</strong><br />
Marketers need to be aware of the customer’s path to purchase, but also who, exactly, is on that path. Using the stepping stone metaphor, imagine you and the potential customer are standing together on the “Inquire” stepping stone. Look around and you’ll probably see any number of competitors standing there with you, and when you look at the customer you may be looking at one person or a collection of <a href="http://www.thebuyersphereproject.com/introduction-the-buyersphere/mapping-the-buyersphere/#The Doer and the Buyer">doers, buyers and/or bosses</a>. In this potentially crowded space, a Marketer needs to stand out and be noticed. </p>
<p>For the customer, the Inquire step may include actions like conversations with people in their industry, reading industry publications, paying attention to advertising, surfing vendor web sites, and searching online. As a vendor, if you can picture yourself with a bunch of competitors, all precariously standing on a crowded “Inquire” stepping stone, you know that if you’re standing at the back of the pack the customer may not even know you are there. </p>
<p>As the customer’s journey down the path to a purchase progresses, will they find you later if they missed you at the “Inquire” step? Maybe, because at the early stage the customer’s initial line of inquiry may be so off base that they end up retreating to the first step, and reassessing the circumstances that triggered the process in the first place, or there may be such limited options for the solution they need, that your solution becomes more visible as they move from “Inquire” to “Refine”. </p>
<p>However, if they don’t see you at the Inquire step, you could be missing a chance to frame the conversation advantageously and <a href="http://www.thebuyersphereproject.com/introduction-the-buyersphere/maximizing-your-online-touch-points/#Importance of Online Influencers">influence</a> the rest of their journey. That’s one reason why it’s so important to have a good search marketing strategy, to get exposure to customers early in their purchase process. </p>
<p>It may take months and months to get from the initial inquiry phase all the way to a final purchase, depending on the business you’re in and the perceived risks associated with the purchase. We’ve also seen six-figure purchases that went from inquiry to purchase in a week, but the point is that marketers need to make sure the right message is in front of the right person, at the right time in their purchasing process.</p>
<p><strong> Job #2 – Stay on the Path</strong><br />
As we can see, there are two factors that can drop a vendor off the customer’s path to a purchase. The first is if the vendor fails to recognize who they’re dealing with at each step on the path to purchase. What is the customer’s approach to making the kind of purchase they’re considering? The vendor needs to be sensitive to the different needs of the audience – the doers, buyers and bosses. They have different ideas about the risk associated with making or not making the purchase, and different needs in terms of the kind of information they need to help them decide. </p>
<p>Secondly, if the vendor is clumsy in moving their sales process along from Marketing to Sales, the risk is that the customer moves on along the path but the vendor is stuck in one place. The Marketing team may have nurtured a sale along to the Shortlist step, only to hand off a qualified sales prospect to Sales and then not have them follow up in a timely manner, and ultimately losing the sale.  </p>
<p><strong>About the author</strong><br />
Karl Hourigan is a Digital Marketing Strategist with Mediative. This is the second article on the Seven Stepping Stones on the Path to Purchase. You can <a href="http://ask.enquiro.com/2011/seven-stepping-stones-on-the-path-to-purchase/">read part one on this blog</a>, and <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/karlhourigan/the-seven-stepping-stones">view a slide deck at Slideshare</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ask.enquiro.com/2011/the-second-stepping-stone-inquire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Star Trek Can Teach Us About Buyer Behavior</title>
		<link>http://ask.enquiro.com/2011/star-trek-buyer-behavior/</link>
		<comments>http://ask.enquiro.com/2011/star-trek-buyer-behavior/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 15:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian Everdell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[B2B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B2B Buyer Behaviour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[b2b marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Experience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ask.enquiro.com/?p=1877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The voyages of the Star Trek Enterprise took viewers to distant galaxies, exposed them to alien species, and taught them countless life lessons (right?). But did you know there were also lots of lessons in there about buyer behavior? Allow me to explain&#8230; Red shirt, no real purpose = death. Granted, in Star Trek, including an alien battle makes the episode more exciting. But the story line is developed by the main characters, not that ensign you see for 6 seconds before he gets killed. The aliens didn&#8217;t have time to deal with insignificant, pointless Away Team members. Think about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The voyages of the Star Trek Enterprise took viewers to distant galaxies, exposed them to alien species, and taught them countless life lessons (right?). But did you know there were also lots of lessons in there about buyer behavior? Allow me to explain&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Red shirt, no real purpose = death.</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://ask.enquiro.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/expendable.jpg"><img src="http://ask.enquiro.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/expendable-241x300.jpg" alt="" title="expendable" width="241" height="300" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1883" /></a></p>
<p>Granted, in Star Trek, including an alien battle makes the episode more exciting. But the story line is developed by the main characters, not that ensign you see for 6 seconds before he gets killed. The aliens didn&#8217;t have time to deal with insignificant, pointless Away Team members.</p>
<p>Think about sinking resources and screen real estate into a part of your site that&#8217;s got no real purpose. Your visitors don&#8217;t need distractions like that flashy red button over there that doesn&#8217;t have any impact on the story you&#8217;re trying to tell.</p>
<p><strong>Data and human emotions just do not mesh.</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://ask.enquiro.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/data-emotion-chip1.jpg"><img src="http://ask.enquiro.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/data-emotion-chip1-300x126.jpg" alt="" title="data-emotion-chip" width="300" height="126" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1888" /></a></p>
<p>Data always struggled trying to understand human emotions. Even with an emotion chip, he still couldn&#8217;t quite grasp them properly.</p>
<p>Analytics are great &#8211; they tell you what visitors did on your site, how long they did it for, where they came from, where they went, how much money they spent&#8230; but they don&#8217;t tell you <i>why</i> visitors did something. There is no substitute (emotion chip, etc.) for true human emotions. You need to talk to real people to find out what they&#8217;re experiencing on your site.</p>
<p><strong>I&#8217;m a doctor, Jim, not a&#8230;</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://ask.enquiro.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/im-a-doctor-jim.jpg"><img src="http://ask.enquiro.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/im-a-doctor-jim-300x224.jpg" alt="" title="im-a-doctor-jim" width="300" height="224" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1884" /></a></p>
<p>Poor Bones. Kirk just kept throwing stuff at him that he wasn&#8217;t familiar with. You need to take the time to understand your visitors, so that you&#8217;re presenting them with information and tasks that they can understand and complete without getting frustrated with you.</p>
<p><strong>Our neural pathways have become accustomed to your sensory input patterns.</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://ask.enquiro.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/data-riker.jpg"><img src="http://ask.enquiro.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/data-riker-300x230.jpg" alt="" title="data-riker" width="300" height="230" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1881" /></a></p>
<p>Ok, I&#8217;m taking this one out of context a bit (in case you&#8217;re wondering, this is Riker commenting on the crew&#8217;s friendship with Data), but the point here is that there are lots of tools out there now that let you monitor one specific visitor&#8217;s behaviors, and then present them with content that is uniquely applicable to them. By building up that database of their inputs, you can effectively target your message to them.</p>
<p><strong>In that particular moment, I was reconfiguring the warp field parameters, analyzing the collected works of Charles Dickens, calculating the maximum pressure I could safely apply to your lips, considering a new food supplement for Spot&#8230;</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://ask.enquiro.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/data-jenna-kiss.jpg"><img src="http://ask.enquiro.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/data-jenna-kiss-300x227.jpg" alt="" title="data-jenna-kiss" width="300" height="227" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1889" /></a></p>
<p>Data was extremely good at multitasking, even when &#8220;romantically&#8221; engaged with Jenna. Understanding what else is going on while your visitors are engaged with you through ethnography or similar types of research can give you an idea of how much attention visitors are really giving to you.</p>
<p><strong>Believing oneself to be perfect is often the sign of a delusional mind.</strong></p>
<p>No matter what you think, there is always room for improvement. Getting into A/B and multivariate testing is pretty easy these days, so I suggest you give it a try. Take all of the work you&#8217;ve now done to understand your visitors and use it to start tweaking your designs to optimize conversions. If you need some ideas on what to test or how to optimize parts of your site, check out <a href="http://ask.enquiro.com/2010/a-big-list-of-user-experience-best-practices/" title="A Big List of User Experience Best Practices">user experience best practices</a>, <a href="http://ask.enquiro.com/2011/web-forms-done-right-form-best-practices/" title="Web Forms Done Right: Form Best Practices">form best practices</a>, <a href="http://ask.enquiro.com/2010/5-landing-pages-tests-you-might-not-have-thought-of/" title="5 landing page tests you might not have thought of">landing page testing ideas</a>, <a href="http://ask.enquiro.com/2010/calls-to-action-combat-distractions-coach-conversions/" title="Calls to Action: Combat Distractions, Coach Conversions">call to action best practices</a>, and some of our other <a href="http://ask.enquiro.com/category/usability/" title="Ask.Enquiro articles about usability, user experience, and online experience">online experience articles</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Act, and you shall have dinner; wait, and you shall be dinner.</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://ask.enquiro.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/klingon1.jpg"><img src="http://ask.enquiro.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/klingon1.jpg" alt="" title="klingon1" width="300" height="287" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1885" /></a></p>
<p>This Klingon proverb summarizes the current digital marketing landscape pretty well. It&#8217;s not enough to throw up any old website any more &#8211; you have to understand your customers and what their needs and pains are, and act on giving them what they need to solve their problems. And you have to be constantly monitoring this and adapting to their changing needs. Sit still, and you risk giving up business to your competitors who aren&#8217;t sitting still.</p>
<p><strong>Make it so.</strong></p>
<p>So get out there, boldly go where none of your competitors have gone before, and start getting to know your buyer better. It&#8217;ll pay off.</p>
<p><strong>Engage.</strong></p>
<p>Still not sure what you should to understand your buyers or to optimize your website? <a href="http://www.enquiro.com/services/" title="See the digital marketing services that Enquiro offers">We can help.</a></p>
<p><a href="http://ask.enquiro.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/engage.jpg"><img src="http://ask.enquiro.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/engage-300x200.jpg" alt="" title="engage" width="300" height="200" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1882" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ask.enquiro.com/2011/star-trek-buyer-behavior/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Seven Stepping Stones on the Path to Purchase</title>
		<link>http://ask.enquiro.com/2011/seven-stepping-stones-on-the-path-to-purchase/</link>
		<comments>http://ask.enquiro.com/2011/seven-stepping-stones-on-the-path-to-purchase/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 18:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karl Hourigan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[B2B Buyer Behaviour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[b2b marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ask.enquiro.com/?p=1864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 7 Stepping Stones metaphor is a way to visualize the process that businesses and individuals go through when deciding to purchase something. The process is logical, but it’s not necessarily linear. That’s why I’ve represented key decision points in the process as stepping stones, arranged in a circle around the first stepping stone, from which the path to every purchase always begins. You can call this starting point on the path to purchase “desire”. From this central stone, a buyer may move to any other stepping stone, depending on the complexity of the purchase. Where it gets tricky for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 7 Stepping Stones metaphor is a way to visualize the process that businesses and individuals go through when deciding to purchase something. The process is logical, but it’s not necessarily linear. That’s why I’ve represented key decision points in the process as stepping stones, arranged in a circle around the first stepping stone, from which the path to every purchase always begins. You can call this starting point on the path to purchase “desire”. From this central stone, a buyer may move to any other stepping stone, depending on the complexity of the purchase.<br />
<div id="attachment_1869" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 273px"><a href="http://ask.enquiro.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/First-Stone.jpg"><img src="http://ask.enquiro.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/First-Stone-263x300.jpg" alt="The first stepping stone on the path to purchase is Desire" title="First-Stone" width="263" height="300" class="size-medium wp-image-1869" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Every purchase starts with a desire, or need</p></div><br />
Where it gets tricky for marketers is that the buyer is also free to step from one stone to another in either a clockwise or counter-clockwise direction. They can even decide at any point to simply step back to the very central stepping stone, desire, and begin the journey again. Sometimes a buyer decides that their desire can wait because they can’t find anything to fulfill it, or because they decide the expense is too great, or because new information renders the initial desire irrelevant, and they abandon the purchase altogether. </p>
<p>There are different kinds of purchases, of course, from very simple to very complex. A complex sale will touch all seven stepping stones, whereas a very simple purchase may only touch two or three. As marketers, we can be more effective if we can recognize the journey a buyer is on and understand what they need to move them along the path to purchase – a path that we hope culminates in the selection of our product or service as the ultimate answer to their quest. </p>
<p><strong>The First Stepping Stone: Desire (aka The Need)</strong></p>
<p>The path that leads to making a purchase starts with a desire. In the case of a business purchase, we may want to put a more rational face on it, and call that desire a need. That need may be real or imagined. It may be substantial, rational, considered, whimsical or impulsive. It may be big or small, important or trivial. It doesn’t matter. Once our brains recognize that need, we begin a process that may ultimately lead to a purchase.</p>
<p>Imagine you work in a small office, with one shared printer, and then the printer breaks. You “need” a new printer for the office because the old one is broken and it’s vital that you have a functioning printer. Alright then, call it a need, but just recognize that it’s also a desire. A new printer will mean less hassle, maybe reduced costs, and it can quickly be brought online with a minimum of disruption to the business. If it’s like the old printer you were already familiar with, the learning curve will be shallow. </p>
<p>There is a risk involved in not replacing the broken printer, too. You risk being less efficient, or having to get all your printing done off-site which is going to be less secure and probably more expensive, and it will take more time to get the printing done. The desire to avoid risk, extra work, extra time and extra expense means you’re going to want to replace that printer. The process for replacing it starts with recognizing a desire, or need, for a solution to the problem of not being able to print anything in the office as before, because the printer is broken.</p>
<p>Imagine another scenario: you’re waiting in line at a drugstore checkout. You’ve got your items in a little basket, ready to checkout, and while you’re standing in line you notice the magazine rack by the checkout stand. One magazine cover jumps out at you, featuring a celebrity you’re interested in, and on an impulse you pick the magazine off the rack and toss it into your shopping basket. You didn’t “need” that magazine, but it created a desire and you acted on the impulse. You can rationalize it later if you must, but you decided on the spot that you’d add it to your purchase. </p>
<p>That’s a pretty simple example of a purchase decision. Consider the risk involved in making that magazine purchase. It’s probably pretty low. The cost of the magazine was a few dollars, and if the contents don’t live up to the cover, well, you’ve wasted a few dollars and a few minutes discovering the magazine was a dud. Now go back to thinking about that office with the single printer. In that scenario, you want to make sure you’re purchasing a printer that will meet the needs of the office and provide reliable service for years to come. In other words, there is more risk involved in that purchase, and so the path you’ll take to that purchase will involve making a few more decisions along the way. Those decision points are what I’m referring to as the Stepping Stones on the path to a purchase. If you are a vendor, then it’s vital that you know the steps the buyer takes on their way to a purchase of your product or service, so you can provide the appropriate support at each stepping stone.</p>
<p>In terms of the first stepping stone, desire (or need), how does a vendor anticipate and participate at the beginning of the buyer’s journey? There are two basic marketing approaches at this stage: </p>
<ol>
<li>market your brand to be top of mind when buyers’ desires match your product, or </li>
<li>create the desire for your product.</li>
</ol>
<p><strong>Marketing Strategy #1: Be Top of Mind</strong></p>
<p>Being the top-of-mind brand when people are shopping is a great position to be in. It pays off huge dividends, even if what people associate your brand with isn’t accurate. For example, there was a time when the question “which company makes the safest cars?” would have provoked an answer in many people’s minds of “Volvo” or “Mercedes”, and maybe still does today for many people. Yet the reality is that companies like Hyundai or Volkswagen are picking up awards for vehicle safety just as much or even more than those brands. Despite this fact, Volvo is still reaping the rewards of being the first to really own mindshare for “safe car”.</p>
<p>When you think of an industry you work in or know well, what’s the first company that comes to mind? How did they get to the top of your mental list? Is it because they have been around the longest, have the biggest market share, seem to be everywhere, are in the news a lot, or is it because they’ve differentiated themselves in a striking way, such as way better customer service, pricing, locations, or quality? As marketers, these are good questions to answer. </p>
<p>To be really successful, a brand needs to be #1 or #2, so if you can’t be #1 in your category, you’ve either got to figure out how to be #1, or it might time to invent a new category (seriously!). When the Ford Windstar could no longer claim to be the only minivan with a 5-star crash rating, the Ford marketers switched the message to the only minivan to earn a 5-star crash rating X years in a row – a claim no other manufacturer could make, thereby making them #1 in the category of minivans that have earned 5-stars for X years in a row. </p>
<p>There are lots of authors who have tackled the subject of getting a brand to be top of mind, so I won’t spend too many words on it here; but in terms of being present at the first stepping stone on the path to a purchase when the desire is recognized by the buyer, it’s the marketer’s job to get their attention. The marketer’s toolkit at this point in the journey includes tradeshows, business cards, advertising, publications, online marketing, and on and on.</p>
<p>If you’re not there at the start of the journey, can you still join the path later on? </p>
<p><strong>Marketing Strategy # 2: Create a Desire</strong></p>
<p>In terms of creating desire for a product, some marketers (and salespeople) use this approach with tremendous success. You thought you needed toothpaste, but you were sold a better social life (code for “more sex”) through whiter teeth as result of using one, and only one, particular brand of toothpaste. They created a desire for you to be more popular, more attractive, more socially adept – and who could resist an offer like that, especially when the answer to your desire to be more popular (i.e. have more sex!) was right there in a tube of toothpaste. Why would you buy any other brand?    </p>
<p>They created a risk factor, too. If you don’t buy our toothpaste, you risk being ordinary, the same as you are now, and you will never attain the status of someone with a magnetic personality beaming from your movie-star, glistening white smile. Just make this simple, painless switch and watch your life improve. You didn’t know you needed a more expensive tube of toothpaste. You probably didn’t think there was anything wrong with your smile, or your social life either, until they told you it was lacking. Use our product, be a winner. Don’t use our product, and well…</p>
<p>The create-a-desire approach doesn’t always work and it is not always appropriate for every product, service, or market. It can be a very successful B2C (business-to-consumer) marketing approach however, and many of us have ended up at a till, credit card in hand, purchasing something that we know we don’t really need, but we somehow wanted it badly enough that we justify it in our minds as a treat or something we deserve. For marketers to make this approach work, it’s about emotions. Customers might want the facts and specifications later, to justify their decision to buy, but up to the point where the money changes hands, it’s the emotions that are driving the process.</p>
<p>Can we create a desire in a B2B environment? Sure, it can work there too, but the emotional triggers can vary, depending on who you’re selling to. You might think that emotions don’t come into play in a business-to-business purchase, but they do. Buying a new software solution for your business may not produce quite the same emotional rush as getting that set of golf clubs you’ve been dreaming about, but even when you get past a business’s supposedly rigorous purchasing process, there are still human beings involved in the decision to purchase, and those people have feelings.</p>
<p><strong>Risky Business</strong></p>
<p>In a company purchase, the desire can start at any level, from the factory floor to the C-Suite. Before the final purchase is made, a business purchase may involve several people. We can loosely categorize the people doers, buyers, and bosses. The doers are those folks on the front line, delivering the product or service. The buyers are responsible for making sure company purchasing policies are followed, and have a different set of criteria for judging a vendor. The bosses have a different outlook again, and marketers need to know when each of these types of people is engaged in the purchasing process, and how to deliver the right message in the right way, and at the right time on the path to a purchase.</p>
<p>The desire can be lit by envy of other company’s equipment, processes and accomplishments. You might call it the “me too” syndrome. Sometimes it’s driven by an individual’s ego, but it can also be a genuine desire to compete and excel. Marketers and sales people play on this emotion with case studies, pictures of high-profile product placements, celebrity endorsements, and other techniques. There have been fascinating studies that demonstrate how we humans take social cues from people around us. A great fable that underlines this behaviour is the Emperor’s New Clothes; everybody went along with the herd, pretending to see his fine new robes, until a child pointed out the truth. If everybody else is doing it, many or us are reluctant in that context to be the first to go against the grain. I heard a saying that the nail that sticks out will be pounded down. It can be personally risky to be the nail that sticks out. </p>
<p>The desire can be lit by fear, as in what will happen if your competitors all automate a certain process and you don’t? Marketing technology solutions often uses this approach. There’s also a fear that perhaps an entire industry is going away. Today you have a large brick-and-mortar network of video rental shops, but will that be a viable business next year, or the year after that? In other words, is somebody trying right now to convince Blockbuster to invest in technology and resources to compete with threats from Netflix, PVRs, and the myriad online video distribution channels that are coming along?</p>
<p>Fear is the manifestation of recognized risk, and avoiding risk is a dominant theme in the buying process. There are two kinds of risk; one is personal and the other is corporate. With personal risk, the individual is considering the risk to their own reputation, job security, or pocketbook. With corporate risk, the consideration is about the impact on the company. </p>
<p>Fear can be used to trigger desire; think of the stereotypical good cop/bad cop interrogation: “we can do this the easy way, or we can do it the hard way, it’s up to you.” Fear of the “hard way” creates a desire to avoid suffering, and motivates a more cooperative approach. In a business environment, there may be fear of change when things appear to be working well, and there’s a long history of doing the same thing over and over and getting acceptable results; then there’s fear of not changing, when it’s obvious that the market or industry is being transformed. As marketers, we need to have a keen sensitivity to understand the fear, or perceived risk, that buyers are facing. We also need to understand their tolerance for risk. </p>
<p>If a Sales Manager is recommending that her sales team all be given company-supplied mobile phones, emotionally she will be dealing with the personal risk to how she’s assessed as a manager in that company if the phone purchase turns out to be a waste of money or produces less than anticipated productivity gains. She could also be anxious about what will happen to the company’s performance if they choose the wrong phone and service provider. A purchase like this will probably involve a handful of people; there may be an IT person who is concerned about synchronizing everyone’s email with the new phones; the CFO may not care at all about the phone or the service, but is very keen to know what the justification is for the expense, where the money will come from to implement the purchase, and how the return on investment will be measured; the CEO could be focusing on revenue in and expenditures out, new customers acquired and overall growth, and having just enough information to satisfy a board of directors; the sales team members could be more interested in the phone’s capabilities and ease of use, the impact it will have on helping them increase sales, without much regard to the cost. These are all very different constituents, each looking at the same purchase, but from their own significantly different points of view.</p>
<p><strong>Questions to ask yourself</strong></p>
<p>Is your brand a leader in your space? </p>
<ul>
<li>If yes, then what are your competitors doing about it?</li>
<li>How successful are they now?</li>
<li>What could they do that would be a game changer?</li>
</ul>
<p>If you’re not the brand leader, can you</p>
<ul>
<li>Be disruptive (i.e. change the game)?</li>
<li>Change the conversation (same game, new focus)?</li>
<li>Get some high-profile endorsement?</li>
<li>Spend a fortune on publicity?</li>
<li>Invent a new category or line of business?</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>About the author</strong><br />
<em>Karl Hourigan is a Digital Marketing Strategist at Mediative</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ask.enquiro.com/2011/seven-stepping-stones-on-the-path-to-purchase/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Search can learn from TV &#8211; Part 1</title>
		<link>http://ask.enquiro.com/2011/what-search-can-learn-from-tv-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://ask.enquiro.com/2011/what-search-can-learn-from-tv-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 15:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Pinkerton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[B2B Buyer Behaviour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[b2b marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ask.enquiro.com/?p=1840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The most popular question in search is “what’s next”? There are thousands of opinions, blogs, studies and even conferences devoted to this very topic. The masses tend to head toward the thought of defining the perfect search experience, or perfect search engine. Is this really what is needed, the perfect search engine? How people access content, and how relevant and current that content is, will be the constant factors in this evolution. But can we actually see into the future by learning from the past? Teach Me, Mr. TV Executive According to the viewership numbers from Nielsen, U.S. Television grew [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most popular question in search is “what’s next”?  There are thousands of opinions, blogs, studies and even conferences devoted to this very topic.  The masses tend to head toward the thought of defining the perfect search experience, or perfect search engine. Is this really what is needed, the perfect search engine?</p>
<p>How people access content, and how relevant and current that content is, will be the constant factors in this evolution.  But can we actually see into the future by learning from the past?</p>
<p><strong>Teach Me, Mr. TV Executive</strong><br />
According to the viewership numbers from Nielsen, U.S. Television grew both in numbers of viewers and time spent per viewer over the past few years. This growth occurred in spite of the fact that time-shifted television viewing, Internet video viewing and mobile video viewing all grew as well.</p>
<p>But the historical leaders in viewership, the old guard of TV networks, have seen a decline in viewership. How can the leaders be failing but the industry thriving?<br />
Television&#8217;s audience problem is one of fragmentation. More people may be watching more TV, but they are watching many, many more channels and more vertically specialized programs than they used to. The pie may be bigger, but the slices of that pie are much smaller.</p>
<p><strong>The Fragmentation of Search</strong><br />
The way we consume media and content has changed, and continues to change. Some of the old business models for how content is distributed are failing and failing fast. </p>
<p>What Yahoo!, Google, and Microsoft were able to initially provide was the organization of the world’s content.  This created the formation of the major network providers of search. Google, Yahoo!, and Bing are now the ABC, CBS, and NBC of the 1970’s Television era.</p>
<p>I believe it was not the technology platform that changed people’s behavior to want more specialized TV, but it was their natural intent. Those specialty providers (Food Network, OWN) that rose to provide a portal to better match intent with content succeeded.</p>
<p>But will people always go to Google or Bing to find this content?  Or will the development of more direct access points, and quicker paths to content, fragment the search landscape?  Will specialty App’s, vertical search engines and social portals each take a slice of the pie? And if so, what will this do to your lead gen, online revenue and marketing strategies?</p>
<p><em>In Part 2, we will look at <strong>what a marketer can do</strong> to position themselves to keep pace with search’s evolution.</p>
<p><strong>About the author</strong><br />
<em>Chris Pinkerton is a Senior Account Executive with Mediative<br />
</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ask.enquiro.com/2011/what-search-can-learn-from-tv-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 Tips for Selling Search to the C-Suite</title>
		<link>http://ask.enquiro.com/2010/10-tips-for-selling-search-to-the-c-suite/</link>
		<comments>http://ask.enquiro.com/2010/10-tips-for-selling-search-to-the-c-suite/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 19:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karl Hourigan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEM Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B2B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[b2b marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ask.enquiro.com/?p=1745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Wednesday, December 8, we presented our latest webinar, 10 Tips for Selling Search to the C-Suite. Our panel included Mike Moran, Chief Strategist at Converseon and author of Do It Wrong Quickly, and Jennifer Lemming, the Director of Marketing for DS Waters. In case you missed it, you can watch it on-demand or go through the slide deck at your own pace. Selling Search to the C-Suite View more presentations from Mediative. Mike’s tips from the webinar include: Tip 1: CIOs and CMOs don’t always get it Tip 2: Stick to the value, not the tactics Tip 3: Be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Wednesday, December 8, we presented our latest webinar, <strong>10 Tips for Selling Search to the C-Suite</strong>. Our panel included Mike Moran, Chief Strategist at Converseon and author of Do It Wrong Quickly, and Jennifer Lemming, the Director of Marketing for DS Waters. </p>
<p>In case you missed it, you can <a href="http://pages.enquiro.com/webinar27-tips-for-communicating-digital-marketing-to-the-c-level.html">watch it on-demand</a> or go through the slide deck at your own pace. </p>
<p><!--Slideshare embed code is below --></p>
<div style="width:425px" id="__ss_6104890"><strong style="display:block;margin:12px 0 4px"><a href="http://www.slideshare.net/enquiro/selling-search-to-the-csuite" title="Selling Search to the C-Suite">Selling Search to the C-Suite</a></strong><object id="__sse6104890" width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://static.slidesharecdn.com/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=sellingsearchpowerpoint-101210131329-phpapp01&#038;stripped_title=selling-search-to-the-csuite&#038;userName=enquiro" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"/><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"/><embed name="__sse6104890" src="http://static.slidesharecdn.com/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=sellingsearchpowerpoint-101210131329-phpapp01&#038;stripped_title=selling-search-to-the-csuite&#038;userName=enquiro" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
<div style="padding:5px 0 12px">View more presentations from Mediative.</div>
</div>
<p>Mike’s tips from the webinar include:<br />
Tip 1: CIOs and CMOs don’t always get it<br />
Tip 2: Stick to the value, not the tactics<br />
Tip 3: Be specific about the goals<br />
Tip 4: Be ready to answer hard questions<br />
Tip 5: Never Stop Selling</p>
<p>Jennifer provided some great questions and answers, framing them in a way that a lot of marketers can relate to.</p>
<ul>
<li>Question #1 from Execs: SEM/SEO, what is it? What they really want to know: Will this help me get new customers?</li>
<li>Question/Statement #2 from Execs: I searched for “water” and we didn’t show up. What they really want to know: Why am I paying for this if my friends can’t see it?</li>
<li>Question #3 from Execs: Why aren’t we doing video/social media/email? What they really want to know: What cool things can I show my friends we’re doing?</li>
</ul>
<p>You can sum it up as Educate, Show Improvements, Show ROI, Stay the Course, and…Educate. For the whole story, <a href="http://pages.enquiro.com/webinar27-tips-for-communicating-digital-marketing-to-the-c-level.html">watch the webinar now</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ask.enquiro.com/2010/10-tips-for-selling-search-to-the-c-suite/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The New Word Of Mouth</title>
		<link>http://ask.enquiro.com/2010/the-new-word-of-mouth/</link>
		<comments>http://ask.enquiro.com/2010/the-new-word-of-mouth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 17:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Pinkerton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[B2B Buyer Behaviour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[b2b marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buyer behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BuyerSphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[word of mouth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ask.enquiro.com/?p=1631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok I get it, ratings and reviews are important. It’s kind of obvious. We all know that word of mouth is one of the most creditable and influential touch points in a purchase process. How many times have you asked a colleague or friend ‘where did you get that’ or ‘what do you think of this’. In fact, in an Enquiro research study, it was noted that word of mouth is one of the top three influencing factors in every level of purchase, from very informal to very complex. So besides creating a tribe of raving fans, what are the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok I get it, ratings and reviews are important.  It’s kind of obvious. We all know that word of mouth is one of the most creditable and influential touch points in a purchase process. How many times have you asked a colleague or friend ‘where did you get that’ or ‘what do you think of this’. In fact, in an <a href="http://www.enquiro.com/thebuyersphere/">Enquiro research study</a>, it was noted that word of mouth is one of the top three influencing factors in every level of purchase, from very informal to very complex. </p>
<p>So besides creating a tribe of raving fans, what are the things that a marketer can do to better facilitate word of mouth in their buyers’ natural purchase process?</p>
<p><strong>1. Know Thy User</strong><br />
Deeply understand your audience. Not just the breakdown of who they are, and where they are – but really know what makes them tick.  Dive deep into recognizing what their personal risks are in purchasing your product. Clearly understand the steps they take when considering your products.  Who do they see as the authority in your space? How does your prospect validate you are the right choice? </p>
<p><strong>2. Develop Influential Content – For Free</strong><br />
Enable the new word of mouth on your web properties. Give a voice to your prospects, customers, and your entire <a href="http://www.enquiro.com/thebuyersphere/">BuyerSphere</a>.  According to a 2010 report from Gartner: Majority of consumers (74%) rely on <strong>social networks</strong> to <strong>guide purchase decisions</strong>. </p>
<p>Ratings and reviews, online communities and thought leader forums are all word of mouth venues.  Allow the most authentic voice to speak to your audience – their peers.  I know what you’re thinking, I can’t do that.  What will legal think? What if they say negative things? We will lose control of the message.</p>
<p>Think of it this way.  Your buyers will seek out credible word of mouth insight during their consideration of your potential product or solution; that natural conversation is happening whether you’re there or not. Wouldn’t you rather <a href="http://www.enquiro.com/services/social-media.php">be part of that conversation</a>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ask.enquiro.com/2010/the-new-word-of-mouth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The BuyerSphere Project – An Interview With Gord Hotchkiss</title>
		<link>http://ask.enquiro.com/2010/the-buyersphere-project-an-interview-with-gord-hotchkiss/</link>
		<comments>http://ask.enquiro.com/2010/the-buyersphere-project-an-interview-with-gord-hotchkiss/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Spoeth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[B2B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[b2b marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BuyerSphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gord Hotchkiss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interview]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ask.enquiro.com/?p=904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Originally posted by Jeremy Victor on www.b2bbloggers.com. This interview has been reposted here with his permission. The BuyerSphere Project puts into context all that is changing with B2B marketing and B2B buying behaviors and purchases. It goes in depth on virtually every topic affecting how business buys from business in a digital marketplace. The content of this book is the result of an extensive research initiative conducted by Enquiro with the support of Google, Marketo, Covario, Business.com, and demandbase. While I purchased a copy of the book at Amazon, Enquiro also graciously offers the the book as a free download [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Originally posted by Jeremy Victor on <a href="http://www.b2bbloggers.com">www.b2bbloggers.com</a>. This interview has been reposted here with his permission.</p>
<p><img src="http://ask.enquiro.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Buyersphere.png" alt="Buyersphere" title="Buyersphere" width="146" height="195" class="alignright size-full wp-image-917" />The BuyerSphere Project puts into context all that is changing with B2B marketing and B2B buying behaviors and purchases. It goes in depth on virtually every topic affecting how business buys from business in a digital marketplace. The content of this book is the result of an extensive research initiative conducted by Enquiro with the support of Google, Marketo, Covario, Business.com, and demandbase. While I purchased a copy of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1439261679">the book at Amazon</a>, Enquiro also graciously offers the the book as a free download at the Enquiro web site.</p>
<p>In my <a href="http://www.b2bbloggers.com/blog/lets-talk-books/">Twitter #B2Bbookclub</a> interview with Gord Hotchkiss, Author and CEO of Enquiro, we cover several topics presented in The Buyersphere Project. One thing you are certain to recognize in this interview is that Gord is one of the leading thinkers in understanding the B2B purchasing process and the phycology involved in it that many of us have overlooked for far too long. If you are responsible for or involved in B2B marketing, The BuyerSphere Project is a must read. There is little chance you will find as much useful, helpful information on the changing nature of B2B marketing as Gord has packed into these less than 200 pages. Enjoy!</p>
<p><strong>Jeremy: Gord, thanks for joining us today. I enjoyed reading The BuyerSphere Project tremendously. It stretched my thinking and I think that is what all of as B2B marketers need right now, new thinking. Is this what prompted you to write the book?</strong></p>
<p>Gord: It was a few things. I felt there was little research out there into how companies buy. Also, we had our own experiences that showed there was more to the process than we knew, looking at it with our vendor hats on. So we decided to peak under the hood</p>
<p><strong>Jeremy: It was a good decision. The BuyerSphere Project is filled with useful, helpful information. How is the book being received so far?</strong></p>
<p>Gord: I think it sneaks up on people. When people read through it they find a lot of information. They are surprised at how much is packed into 200 some odd pages. One marketer called it a fire hose…so, it’s definitely building momentum.</p>
<p><strong>Jeremy: I can definitely see why. Let’s start with the definition of “The BuyerSphere.” And why should it be mapped.</strong></p>
<p>Gord: Okay. The premise of the book is to really understand your prospect – to see the process through their eyes. That’s the BuyerSphere. There are three dimensions: their view of the product, their view of the market. And finally, their reality as the buyer. What type of organization, the degree of risk, their role.</p>
<p>It needs to be mapped to allow us to shift our perspective to that of the buyer. And the more risk there is in the purchase (for the buyer) the more we need to invest the time to map the BuyerSphere. Risk is the overwhelming critical factor to understand.</p>
<p><strong>Jeremy: Where do you think generally we are in the adoption curve with B2B marketers viewing their customers this way?</strong></p>
<p>Gord: Very very very very (you get the idea?) early! This is very uncommon, at least from what I’ve seen. It’s a little more common in the B2C world, as they have more of a history of ethnographic customer research, literally, observing their customers “where they live”.</p>
<p>We seem to accept that emotions are common with consumers, but what I think our research showed was that emotion is very much present in the B2B market as well. It’s not a rational marketplace. So, B2B marketers are slow to come to the table in understanding the need of a deep understanding of their prospects emotional reality and the psychology at play here. There just isn’t a big body of info about this.</p>
<p><strong>Jeremy: I’d agree is super early, but when you step back and consider that’s where we are in 2010, it seems almost imcomprehensible. What challenges are b2b marketers having seeing this shift?</strong></p>
<p>Gord: We get caught up in technology, and we forget that what’s really important are the people using the technology. I think B2B marketers are struggling to realize the magnitude of the shift that’s happening. There was a lot of talk in 1999 and 2000 about frictionless B2B markets. That idea was appealing to B2B marketers.</p>
<p>In theory, it commoditized B2B purchasing, Made it rational.But what really happened was that buyers had more information than ever before, which made things more complex, not simpler. The internet introduced a number of new dynamics, just not the ones we expected.</p>
<p><strong>Jeremy: Compounded by the irrational nature of B2B purchasing?</strong></p>
<p>Gord: Exactly. B2B purchasing is all about mitigating risk. And the internet gives us some powerful new ways to do that. Many of which would be surprising to vendors.</p>
<p><strong>Jeremy: This was my first “a-ha” moment in the book. Humans (people) make B2B purchases – and there are often many different people involved in the decision, each with multiple priorities, fears, uncertainties, and doubts.</strong></p>
<p>Gord: For example, we found existing relationships with vendors to be hugely influential in eventual purchases. An early chat with a favored vendor can essentially define the landscape of the purchase. And face to face is still vitally important in high risk scenarios. The web doesn’t change that.</p>
<p><strong>Jeremy: On the topic of risk – will you define Risk Gap for us? And how the emotion of fear impacts the purchasing process?</strong></p>
<p>Gord: We have this vision of a buying funnel, an ideal model of prospect behavior. There are some assumptions there – the process is linear, all prospects are treated equally, and that it is rational and logical. That’s almost never the case. There are incumbent vendors that block the funnel. New prospects come from nowhere. And above all, there’s a risk gap. The process starts with what we call “doers” -the people using the product.</p>
<p>But at some point it switches to “buyers,” -the ones who control budget and that’s usually where you find the risk gap. Suddenly, the decision criteria changes. It switches from product risk to vendor risk. That’s where the funnel often blows apart. Suddenly, vendors disappear from it and new ones come in.</p>
<p><strong>Jeremy: You stress the importance of face-to-face interaction, does the amount of face-to-face interaction needed rise with higher risk?</strong></p>
<p>Gord: Absolutely. We’re built to communicate face to face. There is a richness of communication that other channels can’t match. We need to be face to face to build trust. That’s just how we’re built. Online is efficient communication. Face to face is effective communication. [<--editorial insertion: brilliant quote]</p>
<p>What you need to do is plan a persuasion strategy so you’re using each channel to it’s advantage. Use online to get the right information in the hands of the right people. I called those IQ friction points – the need for information. And then there are EQ friction points – the need for persuasion. That’s the place for face to face.</p>
<p><img src="http://ask.enquiro.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/TheBuyerSphereProject-www.jpg" alt="TheBuyerSphereProject-www" title="TheBuyerSphereProject-www" width="388" height="150" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-920" /><strong>Jeremy: To your firehouse metaphor earlier, we’ve only scratched the surface of Chapters 1 &#038; 2. You really have packed this full. Let’s move to Maximizing Online Touch Points. Why does the influence of online factors increase with risk?</strong></p>
<p>Gord: It comes to something called information asymmetry. The higher the risk, the more information we need. It used to be that the seller always had more information than the buyer, hence the asymmetry. The web changed that. That’s why we have some much more online activity in high risk purchases. Another thing, the “doer” goes much further down the path now, thanks to all the information available online. There’s more of an overlap between doers and buyers. This makes things a lot more complex for the vendor to understand.</p>
<p><strong>Jeremy: How should marketers adapt in the face of this new found “information symmetry” between the buyer and vendor?</strong></p>
<p>Gord: It sounds cliche, but understand that this is a partnership. You have to meet them halfway. Take a servant based approach to the process. You’re there to serve their needs. The better you do that, the more successful you’ll be. And you can only understand needs by getting to know them. Use online to enhance traditional sales practices, not replace them. There is an exponential increase in effectiveness.</p>
<p><strong>Jeremy: And back to your definition of The BuyerSphere – looking at it through their eyes and note your own, right?</strong></p>
<p>Gord: Yes! Absolutely. You can get by without a deep understanding in low risk, commoditized purchases (although this understanding would certainly help), but it’s essential in high risk purchases.</p>
<p><strong>Jeremy: A few more questions before we finish up. First, why do you believe a company’s website is its most important digital asset?</strong></p>
<p>Gord: Our research has shown that it’s the biggest factor in influencing purchases. There is a lot of interaction on it. Increasingly, we have a portfolio of digital assets: podcasts, videos, etc..but the website is still the crown jewel. That’s why it’s essential to understand what people are looking for on it. The rule is, make sure you do the basics first. Pricing, product info, comparisons with the competition, in forms that’s easy to pass along. People love info that they can quickly scan..random access info. Serial access..videos, flash demos, etc, come after. But you have to know who you’re talking to. To be a servant, you have to know “who do you serve?”</p>
<p><strong>Jeremy: So what is your take on those that are beginning to say a Blog is the main hub or most important digital asset?</strong></p>
<p>Gord: Blogs are great for thought leadership. That’s higher up in the chain. It’s essential in carving a niche in the market. It serves a different purpose. It’s an important one, but it’s not a replacement. Again, if you map the buyersphere. You’ll understand the role of a blog in risk mitigation of your prospects. Then evaluate it’s place in your strategy.</p>
<p><strong>Jeremy: Great Quote (pg 145) Information gathering has to support the prospect, not violate the relationship. Question… Why are marketers reluctant to accept this and continue to place the same “lead form” in front every piece of content?</strong></p>
<p>Gord: It’s all about control. Marketers want to control the process. It’s probably the single biggest mindshift that’s needed. They don’t realize other choices are just a click away. This is a path that you’re walking down with your prospect. You direct that journey by providing persuasive paths to follow, not forcing them into dead end alleys. Forcing only works if you prospect has no choice..if you’re a “vending machine in the desert” to use example from the book. And that is probably the single biggest reason why B2B marketers are behind the curve. They hate giving up control.</p>
<p><strong>Jeremy: Just one last question. I agree with you that digital marketing is just preparing to cross the Chasm, what words of advice do you have for today’s B2B marketers?</strong></p>
<p>Gord: Take nothing for granted. With chasm crossings, there is inevitably a changing of the guard. That means there is a dramatic shift in the market place. Treat this as a warning. Things are changing. Nimbleness, responsiveness, boldness and a willingness to make mistakes may not be a guarantee of survival. But they are by far your best bets for success. Online pure plays have eaten the lunch of the big guys in the consumer world. Expect the same to start happening in the B2B world.</p>
<p><strong>Jeremy: Gord, thanks for your time. As a reminder…the book is available as a free download for anyone interested, visit <a href="http://www.enquiro.com/b2bresearch">http://www.enquiro.com/b2bresearch</a>.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ask.enquiro.com/2010/the-buyersphere-project-an-interview-with-gord-hotchkiss/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gord Hotchkiss Interview and Preview to SES San Jose</title>
		<link>http://ask.enquiro.com/2009/gord-hotchkiss-interview-and-preview-to-ses-san-jose/</link>
		<comments>http://ask.enquiro.com/2009/gord-hotchkiss-interview-and-preview-to-ses-san-jose/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 17:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Spoeth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[b2b marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buyer behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BuyerSphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gord Hotchkiss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SES]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ask.enquiro.com/?p=321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a preview to the upcoming Search Engine Strategies conference in San Jose, Byron Gordon of SEO-PR caught up with our CEO &#038; President, Gord Hotchkiss. Gord will be presenting at the search marketing conference as part of its B2B &#038; Vertical track on August 12. He will be joined in person by the same B2B panel of experts that participated in our popular webinar series. The BuyerSphere Project at SES San Jose August 12, 4:00 &#8211; 5:15pm - Gord Hotchkiss, President &#038; CEO, Enquiro - Mark McMaster, Senior Planner of B2B and Technology Markets, Google - Ben Hanna, VP [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/sFA7IRDkMtU&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/sFA7IRDkMtU&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object></p>
<p>As a preview to the upcoming  <a href="http://www.searchenginestrategies.com/sanjose/">Search Engine Strategies conference in San Jose</a>, Byron Gordon of SEO-PR caught up with our CEO &#038; President, Gord Hotchkiss. Gord will be presenting at the search marketing conference as part of its B2B &#038; Vertical track on August 12. He will be joined in person by the same B2B panel of experts that participated in our popular <a href="http://www.b2bexpertseries.com">webinar series</a>. </p>
<p><strong>The BuyerSphere Project at SES San Jose</strong><br />
August 12, 4:00 &#8211; 5:15pm</p>
<p>- Gord Hotchkiss, President &#038; CEO, Enquiro<br />
- Mark McMaster, Senior Planner of B2B and Technology Markets, Google<br />
- Ben Hanna, VP Marketing, Business.com<br />
- Chris Golec, Founder and CEO, Demandbase<br />
- Jon Miller, VP Marketing, Marketo<br />
- Matthias Blume, Chief Analytics Officer, Covario</p>
<p>A major B2B research initiative, conducted by Enquiro with input from Google, Business.com, Covario, Marketo and DemandBase, showed that most marketers are not effectively leveraging online assets to their best potential. Among other things, the notion of a strictly followed, traditional buying funnel is simply not accurate in many instances, risk dictates buying behavior, search is incredibly important as an integrator across online and offline channels and face-to-face persuasion is still necessary in many high risk, complex purchases. </p>
<p>The BuyerSphere project looks at how online strategies became artificially separated from traditional best practices, how they can be more effectively integrated and the part search plays as a major influencer. This panel will review the research from over 100 face-to-face interviews, hundreds of eye tracking sessions and over 3,000 survey responses in total. The project represents a major step forward in understanding B2B buyer patterns and the part online marketing can play in influencing them.</p>
<p>For more background the B2B marketing webinar and white paper series, see <a href="http://www.enquiro.com/b2bresearch">www.enquiro.com/b2bresearch</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ask.enquiro.com/2009/gord-hotchkiss-interview-and-preview-to-ses-san-jose/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Age Is Your Customer? June 24 Webinar Explores the Digital Age Divide</title>
		<link>http://ask.enquiro.com/2009/what-age-is-your-customer-june-24-webinar-explores-the-digital-age-divide/</link>
		<comments>http://ask.enquiro.com/2009/what-age-is-your-customer-june-24-webinar-explores-the-digital-age-divide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Spoeth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[B2B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[b2b marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[b2b marketing research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BuyerSphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Danny Sullivan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gord Hotchkiss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Fishkin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Webinars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ask.enquiro.com/2009/what-age-is-your-customer-june-24-webinar-explores-the-digital-age-divide/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can hardly believe we&#8217;re only a few days away from wrapping up the BuyerSphere webinar series.&#160; It has been quite a journey.&#160; Since the beginning of April, we&#8217;ve been building this amazing package of webinars and research papers which go to the very core of B2B marketing.&#160; Experts from Google, Business.com, Covario, Demandbase and Marketo have all contributed their unique experience and marketing advice. If you&#8217;ve missed them so far, you can still get the recordings and white papers at www.enquiro.com/b2bresearch. Our final webinar in the series will be &#8211; in my opinion &#8211; one of the most fascinating [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can hardly believe we&#8217;re only a few days away from wrapping up the <a target="_blank" href="http://enquiro.com/b2bresearch/">BuyerSphere webinar series</a>.&nbsp; It has been quite a journey.&nbsp; Since the beginning of April, we&#8217;ve been building this amazing package of webinars and research papers which go to the very core of B2B marketing.&nbsp; Experts from Google, Business.com, Covario, Demandbase and Marketo have all contributed their unique experience and marketing advice. If you&#8217;ve missed them so far, you can still get the recordings and white papers at <a target="_blank" href="http://www.enquiro.com/b2bresearch">www.enquiro.com/b2bresearch</a>.</p>
<p>Our final webinar in the series will be &#8211; in my opinion &#8211; one of the most fascinating and thought provoking.&nbsp; We&#8217;re calling it <a href="https://www2.gotomeeting.com/register/882657642"><i>The Rise of the Digital Native: B2B Buying in Flux</i></a>.&nbsp; Gord Hotchkiss and his panel of experts are taking a look at a very basic but fundamental question: Does age play a role in marketing?&nbsp; What does Enquiro&#8217;s latest research show us about B2B buying behavior as it relates to the buyer&#8217;s demographic, and more specifically, how and when the buyer grew up?</p>
<p>For the first time ever in an Enquiro webinar, we&#8217;re also joined by Danny Sullivan and Rand Fishkin, two very big hitters in the Search Marketing industry.&nbsp; They will be part of the panel along with our own Gord Hotchkiss, Ben Hanna (Business.com), Chris Golec (Demandbase), Matthias Blume (Covario) and Mark McMaster (Google).&nbsp;</p>
<p>As an attendee of the live event, you will get to hear the discussion as it happens, plus be able to send the panel your marketing-related questions.&nbsp; We will also be touching upon the highlights of the rest of the series, so if you&#8217;ve missed previous webinars, don&#8217;t miss out on this one. To top it off, one lucky attendee will win a BuyerSphere hard copy white paper package, plus a 15-minute search marketing audit with an Enquiro account manager. </p>
<p><b>The Rise of the Digital Native</b><br />
Live Webinar<br />
Wednesday, June 24&nbsp; 2:00pm Pacific<br />
<a href="https://www2.gotomeeting.com/register/882657642">Register now &#8211;&gt;</a></p>
<p>The webinar explores:</p>
<ul>
<li>The differences between a Digital Native and a Digital Immigrant</li>
<li>Why the brain gets wired differently in Digital Natives</li>
<li>How this impacts interactions with technology and the web</li>
<li>What are the implications for B2B buying</li>
<li>How the landscape might shift in the next decade</li>
</ul>
<p>Panelists:<br />
Gord Hotchkiss &#8211; President and CEO, Enquiro<br />
Rand Fishkin &ndash; CEO and Co-Founder, SEOmoz<br />
Danny Sullivan &#8211; Editor-in-Chief, Search Engine Land<br />
Ben Hanna &#8211; VP Marketing, Business.com<br />
Mark McMaster &#8211; Senior Planner of Technology/B2B Markets, Google<br />
Chris Golec &#8211; Founder and CEO, Demandbase<br />
Moderated by Bill Barnes, EVP Business Development, Enquiro</p>
<p><img height="204" align="middle" width="406" alt="Rand Fishkin and Danny Sullivan join Enquiro webinar panel" src="http://ask.enquiro.com/wp-content/uploads/danny-rand.jpg" /></p>
<p>Rand Fishkin, CEO and founder of SEOmoz, and Danny Sullivan, Editor-in-Chief of Search Engine Land will be special guests at the wrap-up to the BuyerSphere webinar series, June 24.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ask.enquiro.com/2009/what-age-is-your-customer-june-24-webinar-explores-the-digital-age-divide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PPC Measurability: A Double Edged Sword</title>
		<link>http://ask.enquiro.com/2009/ppc-measurability-a-double-edged-sword/</link>
		<comments>http://ask.enquiro.com/2009/ppc-measurability-a-double-edged-sword/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 23:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Grant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attribution Model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attribution Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[b2b marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business-to-Business Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BuyerSphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paid Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sponsored]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ask.enquiro.com/2009/ppc-measurability-a-double-edged-sword/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In marketing circles, the old adage: &#34;Half my advertising money is wasted. The problem is that I don&#8217;t know which half!&#34; is often regarded as marketing fact and has been more or less accepted as fact until now. In a down economy marketers are now heralding this statement no longer as a quote, but as a mission statement to finding where to invest money.&#160; However, the very nature of this quote embodies the challenge that all marketers face: attribution. The famous marketing quote was reportedly said by William Lever, John Wanamaker, and F.W. Woolworth; begging the question: who gets the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In marketing circles, the old adage: &quot;Half my advertising money is wasted. The problem is that I don&#8217;t know which half!&quot; is often regarded as marketing fact and has been more or less accepted as fact until now. In a down economy marketers are now heralding this statement no longer as a quote, but as a mission statement to finding where to invest money.&nbsp; However, the very nature of this quote embodies the challenge that all marketers face: attribution. The famous marketing quote was reportedly said by William Lever, John Wanamaker, and F.W. Woolworth; begging the question: who gets the credit? Do we give credit to who said it first, said it last, or do we give credit to all equally?</p>
<p>While we are thinking about the question of whom do we accredit the quote to, now let&rsquo;s think more close to home; how to we accredit revenue to individual marketing channels?</p>
<p>The double edged sword of PPC measurability is the ability to measure with a great deal of accuracy how paid search is performing and yet it is still easy measure impact wrong when looking at performance rather myopically. There are many different ways to attribute ROAS, such as first click, last click and a linear attribution model. Making decisions based on an individual attribution window could introduce significant error into your decision process and affect the total ROAS of your paid search campaign.</p>
<p>The problem with most analytics tools is that they attempt to apply linear modeling to explain a problem solved with bounded rationality. Business-to-business purchase behaviour is not a simple linear series of events, but more of an entanglement of communication touch points where a decision can be easily swayed by a chance encounter or incalculable externality. Most revenue attribution models ignore that paid search is only one marketing channel that is interrelated to all other marketing activities; which involve both online and offline company touch points.</p>
<p>With B2B marketing, many purchases involve multiple interactions with the vendor from multiple touch points prior to purchase. A study of a retailers, conducted by Coremetrics, indicates that all buyers had interacted with at least 3.9 campaigns prior to purchase; in a B2B environment it can easily be many more. This does not factor in many of the elements active within the B2B purchasing <a href="http://www.enquiro.com/b2bresearch/">BuyerSphere</a>. Enquiro&rsquo;s <a href="http://pages.enquiroresearch.com/brand-lift-of-search.html?source=Brand_Lift_Of_Search_whitepaper">Brand Lift of Search</a> research also indicates that sponsored listings increase a prospective customer&rsquo;s propensity to purchase by 8% and occupying the top sponsored position increased aided brand recall by 150%. These are all facts that a simple revenue attribution model can easily de-emphasize.</p>
<p>The majority of companies are still solely relying of the last click attribution model, which attributes the entirety of the revenue to the last point of interaction with the site before purchase. The inherent risk with this type of attribution model is the emphasis on the conversion-oriented campaigns and gives no attribution to the campaigns that originally started the marketing conversation. By making bid management and investment decisions based on only this information, the risk of divesting into the acquisition or branding channels increases substantially; effectively reducing the overall effectiveness of the marketing efforts. This risk increases if the company has a relatively unknown brand in the marketplace. The same can be said for focusing only on the first click attribution where we are looking only at the value of the keywords at the beginning of the purchase decision cycle and can ignore the importance of the conversion keywords at the end of the purchase process.</p>
<p>The only answer to this analytics dilemma is to strike a balanced measure using multiple attribution windows. Coremetrics has recently released a great whitepaper on <a href="http://www.coremetrics.com/resources/white_papers.php">Appropriate Attribution models</a> which is a great read for any marketer on how to better attribute revenue to your online marketing efforts. For quite some time Enquiro&rsquo;s <a href="http://www.enquiro.com/sponsored-search-PPC-solution.asp">Sponsored Search Team</a> has been using a similar model of revenue attribution within the confines of the abilities of existing analytics programs, which vary depending on the provider you are using. However, we have also found great success in determining how paid search integrates into the macro-level marketing equation by using a micro-conversion and correlation analysis.</p>
<p>Often Paid Search campaigns are evaluated based on the number of qualified leads they have brought in or the strict revenue they have generated, but there is a missing element of how this impacts the overall marketing efforts. Post click behavior is an important element to any revenue attribution analysis such as the subscription to an email newsletter, requesting a catalog, downloading a whitepaper or other important marketing collateral, calling the phone number listed on the site. Each of these interactions with the website is part of the marketing conversation and can be assigned a value based on historical conversion rates and average order values. These numbers can then be applied to the paid search campaign as part of the revenue attribution model to assist in determining the value of paid search.</p>
<p>Another important metric is to measure the correlation of paid search traffic with direct and branded site traffic. Paid search may be the gateway to starting the marketing conversation with the prospect, but may only be the initial touch point. Measuring the impact of paid search on the direct and branded traffic can indicate how paid search is acting to acquire customers and brand the company in the marketplace. A simple correlation analysis is effective in revealing whether paid search is having a positive impact on the overall traffic to the site. The user may not necessary complete the desired conversion in the same session, but may use a direct or branded search to navigate back to the site at a later time to continue the relationship building process.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Unfortunately, analysis of the marketing efforts often collides with internal politics which often complicates issues and can even impact the distribution of budgets. However, knowing how your paid search campaigns interact with other marketing channels, drive revenue, and build relationships can assist in determining the total value of the marketing channel.</p>
<p>The key takeaway from this is to look at the impact of your paid search campaigns as holistically as possible to determine your total ROAS. What is the direct revenue from the campaign? Does the ROAS change when using an appropriate attribution model? How does your paid search campaign initiate the marketing conversation and act as a relationship development tool?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ask.enquiro.com/2009/ppc-measurability-a-double-edged-sword/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

